Monday, January 11, 2010

Future Directions in Quality Journey – Some Views

Quality as a profession has evolved over a period of time. In prehistoric period Quality was practiced in form of the regulatory requirement. Hammurabi Code is known for the punishment to be met out by the builders/ masons if the house collapses and the people residing in the house suffer injury or death.

  1. Evolution is a process that is characterized by
  2. Variation
    or change in more generic sense

The selection of variant that is most suitable and follows the principle of Evolution namely "Survival of the Fittest"

Quality journey in formal sense became necessary with industrialization. The era before mass production was characterized by the individual artisans, who managed the quality of their outputs by themselves. The initial methods of managing Quality were driven by INSPECTION and were controlled by profession that we know as Inspectors/ Testers etc. This new role actually created significant divide between the role of producer and the inspector. This divide is visible even today in many organizations and eliminating this divide is one of the biggest change management exercise for the Quality Professional.

The usage of statistics is the scientific community was well known. The tools used by the researchers crept into the organizations to manage business processes. These got formal name of Statistical Quality Control (initially used primarily by Inspectors) and then came Statistical Process Control (expected to be used by the Process Owners and Operators).

In the 1920's Shewhart introduced the concepts of statistical quality control. Statistical quality control provided the foundation for understanding and reducing variability through application of statistical theories. SPC tools provided the ability to ensure that processes and variability were controlled to provide consistent high quality telephones and networks for Western Electric and AT&T.

Dr. Deming provided the management philosophy of his theory of profound knowledge, and his 14 points, which were quite radical in his day

The process orientation led to think in terms of using tools to improve

  1. Effectiveness of the Process
  2. Efficiency of the Process.

The lack of above is expressed or reflected as problems in the operations.

The analysis of processes led to concepts of Business Process Reengineering. BPR Focused on making the business processes meaningful and eliminates unnecessary steps / activities. The concept emerged strongly later with Lean Methodologies.

On the productivity Side, in the first part of the 20th century Henry Ford introduced the Ford Production System, which provided the ability to mass-produce a Model T Ford in any color the customer wanted, as long as it was black. The Ford production system was the basis for the Toyota Production system. The Toyota Production System emphasized employee learning and empowerment for the first time. In the 80's, Just-in-Time principles arose as an off-shoot of the Toyota production system. The focus on JIT was to pull supplies and components through a system to arrive where and when they are needed.

As the Toyota Production System and JIT evolved and coalesced into Lean, the philosophies of TQM and the statistical theories of SQC evolved into Six Sigma.

Lean starts with an external focus on supplying the customer with exactly what the customer wants when they want it, through the value chain.

Six Sigma captured the voice of the customer and critical to quality characteristics, a rigorous and structured problem solving methodology, as well as a formal knowledge and tool belt structure, focus on the bottom-line impact of process improvement, and measurement and metrics.

Information Technology has evolved along with the management philosophies and problem solving tools, going from stand-alone software packages, with non-integrated modules, such as the financials, separate from MRP, separate from engineering, process, and production data, as well as customer information. ERP evolved to integrate the wide spectrum of processes and information that wasn't possible in the MRP and MRP II days.

Integration of Lean and Six Sigma enhanced the focus on eliminating waste AND reducing variability at the same time. Supply Chain concepts and tools have integrated the value chain with the information chain.

Further integration of the supply chain with lean six-sigma is already being most talk about concept today. This will lead to focus on improving up and downstream through the supply chain with the suppliers and the distributors.

TQM - Total Quality Management became huge in the 80's and 90's, and was the formulation of many of the quality guru's management philosophies, including Deming, Juran, Crosby, and Feigenbaum.

It was light on statistical tools and problem solving methodology and left that almost to chance, but provided for employee involvement, team-based brainstorming and problem solving, employee empowerment.

Innovation:

Innovation has remained part of Human Evolution in different form. Use of wheel and fire for enhancing quality of life is an example of early innovations.

Innovation as an economic concept includes development of new:

  • Products and services (Ginger Hotel Chain)
  • Methods of production or provision (Cellular Manufacturing concept)
  • Methods of transportation or service delivery (ATM)
  • Business models (Crowd Sourcing and Social Networking Platform for business)
  • Markets
  • Forms of organization

Stereotypically innovation is considered a product of genius, a flash of light. However, the practitioners have evolved systematically planned and organized innovations.

Future of the Quality Tools

Tools:

Tools developed and evolved can be classified in broadly two categories

  1. People Centric

    These tools have evolved and become stronger due to

  • Availability of better skills
  • Aspiration of more skilled employees to be part of improvement journey
  • Most employees reaching and striving for higher level of Maslow's hierarchy of motivation
  1. Data Centric

    The tools here were largely through statistics and application of statistical approaches. Initially it was largely Bayesian statistics and later the inferential statistics become stronghold. This is becoming stronger with quantity of data that is available now for studies.

    It was easier to implement largely due to availability of skilled manpower and also availability of software that assist in using these tools easily.

Some direction on specific areas could be

  1. Six Sigma
  • Reduction in Cycle Time as project area is most common and is considered to be most beneficial to the customer and industry
  • Inclusion of Vendor's organization in Six Sigma Projects
  • Integrating Six Sigma with other initiatives
  • Restructuring of time allocation within the DMAIC and PDCA Structure
  • The Impact of Technological Advancements
  • Modeling Tools
  • Impact of Global Recession
  1. Open Source Innovation
  2. Quality Tools Deployment would be through automation and also building AI / Neural Network concepts
  3. Documentation of learning and project would become a specialized skill

Challenges in Quality Management

  1. Larger base of knowledge and data
  2. The pace at which the options are available to consumer
  3. The fast pace life of consumer and hence changes in demand at high speed

    The challenges in general can be detailed as below:

    Ever Demanding Customers

    Increased options and greater knowledge on the product life cycle has definitely led to ever increasing demands.

    Shifting Customer Value Perception

    The life of a value perception is shorter as the product life itself is coming down. The new products introduction, which used to take years, now takes months. The value perception is also frequently subjected to changes due presence of strong media and internet that provides faster information about product and businesses.

    Increasing Economic Pressures

    Generally demand on all resources has increased sharply. The pressure on organization to perform at higher level is increasing. The organizations performance is being micro viewed by the investors in short run. In fact long term has become either obsolete or the period of long term has come down significantly.

    Reduced Control over Data and Information

    With internet and computerization, the access and availability of data is relatively easier. RTI has further changed the dimension of the data availability for any analysis and working.

    Recognition of Softer Issues in Business Process

    With growth in the knowledge of the worker, and the trend of businesses becoming more knowledge focus, the management processes calls for looking into softer issues of Human Relations within and out of the Business Processes. In early part of 20th century Ford wanted only two hands and two legs, but today organizations want the matter above the shoulder more importantly than the limbs. This has definitely forced organization to look into the softer side of human management. The human resource management moved from treating human as another article to a resource that can contribute and enable better utilization of other resources.

    Risk Based Management Approach

    Risk based management approaches emerged more strongly towards the end of the 20th century and is becoming stronger area of specialization and focus for business entities. While initially the risk was associated only with finance management, but today the risk based approach has been extended to management of Product Development, Process, Employees, Environment etc.

    The risk based approach itself has moved from being subjective to an objective evaluation of the risk.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Ways to minimize the BOSS Effect in Meetings

I saw this on LinkedIn posted by a friend of mine.

Quote

meetings are funny. productivity is determined by how focussed or awake the boss is. you can see group attention change as does boss'

Unquote

It is so true that most of would not even think of disagreeing with the situation. This is result of our approach of one or many of the following:

  1. Rule number 9 & 10| Rule 9—BOSS is always right| Rule 10 – If BOSS is wrong refer rule 9
  2. Several centuries of having ruled under slavery like environment, differing with BOSS is often considered to be courageous (read suicidal)
  3. Path of easy approach
  4. Avoiding confrontation

The meetings as I have experienced are of three types:

  1. Exploratory
    1. These meetings are often to develop New Plan / New Approaches/ New strategies
    2. Most often the agenda is futuristic
    3. The current information is only used to look into future (forecast or predict)
    4. It is more like brainstorming
  2. Review
    1. These meeting are for reviewing
      1. the status of a project
      2. performance as against the target
      3. operations

    2. These involve
      1. the presentation of data on performance
      2. comparative statements on performance
  3. Information Sharing
    1. These are of the type where the senior is expected to communicate on certain important issues like union meeting progress, special business situation etc.

The last type is not an area of concern. I would try to put my thoughts on how to minimize impact of BOSS in first two type of meeting

Exploratory Meetings:

  1. While the meeting is expected to be exploratory, it is necessary to bringing objectivity in the meeting. For example, if we are doing a meeting in to build a strategic plan for the business the steps that could help are
    1. Making the topic specific for example in place of saying Business Strategy we can "Strategy to meeting the risk ABC"
    2. Insistence of Home work on the topic and circulation of the opinion/ views prior to meeting (This rarely happens)
  2. Most important of all these that BOSS should speak in the last. Most meeting would begin with a "lecture" by the BOSS. Making this last thing in the agenda itself can help in making meeting more productive.

Review Meetings:

  1. The problem begins with not having an objective response to following questions on review:
    1. What to review?
      1. Can I say "Sales Actual versus Budget for a period" instead of saying Sales Department Performance
    2. Data for review
      1. Often the review comments or the comments on the performance would be subjective. For example "the sales have improved". Instead we should seek to know improved from "where to where in what period".
  2. The review presentation should be made with data and interpretation based on information presented in following order
    1. Current Level of Performance
    2. Trend in the performance (minimum of 3 data points)
    3. Comparison of performance with target, benchmark etc
  3. Interpretation must include the linkage to the process that has resulted in the change in performance.

I have tried to list the above based on my experience. These cannot eliminate the impact of BOSS on behavior during meeting, but would reduce. The most important step toward this would be acceptance of the BOSS to reduce his/her role in the meeting.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Management Lessons from Srimad Bhagvat Geeta

The more I reflect the more I get absorbed at how certain basic tenets do not change over time. Anyone who has read the book by Partha Bose "Alexander the Great's Art of Strategy" would agree with me that corporate strategy and warfare have not changed since then. I would dwell on that some time later. Continuing from the earlier issue, I would like to explore the aspects around Performance and Performance Management. This time I am picking up shlokas from Chapter 2 of Srimad Bhagawat Geeta.


"And if you do not engage in this righteous war, you will lose the dharma of your Self and glory, and be guilty of sin.''

"And all will for ever speak of your disgrace and such disgrace is worse than death itself for a man of honour.''


 

All of us engaged with the organization to perform a particular task (dharma) in a righteous manner. What is righteous is driven by the Values and Beliefs of the organization. In absence of Values and Beliefs the "Right" becomes subjective and can get trapped into interpretation of convenience.

If we do not perform our duty (Dharma) we are losing our self and would be guilty of misdeed (sin). We can probably make ourselves believe that we only acted / behaved as instructed, but a simple soul search will tell us the truth. One can lie to all but not to oneself. Abraham Lincoln quoted most appropriately

You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.

"Unknown"

People will long speak ill of errors and omissions committed by one. We often forget the goods done by individuals, but remember the misdeeds in granular details. We all remember the misdeeds of Indira Gandhi during emergency much more than her contribution to the country.

One must act based on what people would like to write in their epitaph rather than what people would say behind their back. When your life has ended (maybe after you have lived a long, long time), how would you like your friends to remember you? Write a dialogue between two of your friends. What do they say about you?

"Those who say that life is worth living at any cost have already written an epitaph of infamy, for there is no cause and no person that they will not betray to stay alive"

--- Sidney Hook

We must perform at levels where we can make the wish expressed by Iqbal in his famous lyrics true in organization.

"Khudi ko kar buland itna ke har taqder se pehle

Khuda bande se ye poche bata teri raza kia hai"

(simple meaning of this lyric is one must make oneself such that god would ask one before deciding one's fate)

We must also be aware of the forces that would prevent us from achieving this kind of success. We would definitely remember the famous story of a frog that succeeded only because it was deaf enough not to hear the discouraging calls by his friends.

We try to identify these others. Who are these other great warriors? They have to be warriors as they would either fight for your growth or against your growth. They could be one among your seniors, peers and at time even subordinates at your work place.


"Even the great warriors who have a high regard for you will then scorn you for having turned your back upon the war out of fear.''


 

The other formidable warriors are those who desire for pleasure/ opportunity towards your visible acts that may not righteous, even if you did it out of ignorance (We do have people who have sadistic pleasure in your failure). These people would prevent you from taking the right path partly out of ignorance and partly intentionally. It is these who would be more critical of you when you fail. Beware of them. Let them not transgress you from your path of success. Identify them as quickly as possible.

We would continue later to discuss how to work around and succeed without wasting energy to identify these warriors.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Learning Management tips from Scriptures

I have been pondering over to find relevance of Srimad Bhagwad Geeta to the way we manage our work more specific to the IT Industry business processes. I must also confess that these are my views and is not intended to hurt any individual or group in specific. Resemblance to any specific individual or group is mere coincidence.

In the series of these articles, I am going to pick a few shlokas from Srimad Bhagwad Geeta and explain the shloka from the spiritual point of view as explained by yogis and renowned speakers. I would then submit my interpretation of the same with reference to business processes in IT Industry.

Let's begin with a shloka in Chapter One of the Srimad Bhagwad Geeta


11. "So, while keeping to your respective stations in the several divisions, all of you should doubtlessly protect Bheeshma alone on all sides."

Excerpts from Commentary on above (Courtesy www.yatharthgeeta.com):

Duryodhan (The eldest of Kauravas – 100 brothers) commands all his chiefs to keep to their posts and yet protect Bheeshma on all sides. The Kaurav cannot be defeated if Bheeshma is safe and alive. So it is obligatory for all the Kaurav chiefs to defend Bheeshma rather than fight with the Pandav. Bheeshma is a form of delusion. A delusion is commonly defined as a false belief, and is used in everyday language to describe a belief that is either false, fanciful or derived from deception. So long as delusion is alive, unrighteous impulses cannot be vanquished. If delusion ceases, ignorance too ceases to exist. That which is free from delusion is eternal and unmanifest. Today we admire a sage for his virtue, but the very next day we grumble because we have seen him relishing delicacies. Devotion is shaken by suspicion of even the slightest flaw in the loved one. The impulse of righteousness is undermined and the ties with the object of affectionate devotion are broken.

Interpretation of commentary to IT Business Context

Can we look at the delusions we live in the workspace? Remember this workspace constitutes at least 30% of average working-life, may be many of us this could be as high as 50 %.

Senior Management lives in delusion that is surrounded by being nice rather than being factual. I am reminded of the famous couplet that we read in Sanskrit in school days. "Satyam Vada Priyam Vada …." Which means you must speak truth while you speak it nicely. Speak untruth nicely or speaking truth rudely does not help. I believe this is the essence of PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. Let us search our soul and find how often we provide feedback that is fact and nicely presented.

Rest of the organization lives in the delusion that absence of feedback means the performance or result is good. In early days of Process of Making anything (say sculpting), the performance/ result was assessed by the maker himself. There were no lines quality professional or managerial teams to give feedback. Self Assessment is core to the PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.

We often classify an individual as GREAT PERFORMER (like the praise to the sage) and next moment we would brand the GREAT PERFORMER as UNFIT For the job (just as we did to the sage because we saw him enjoying delicacies).

Delusions can go only when IGNORANCE disappears. Who can make the IGNORANCE Disappear? I believe there are only 2 sources that can make this happen:

  1. Self Actualization

    Ignorance is bliss is not true in most real life scenario. Examples

  • Customers are not going be satisfied because we were ignorant to their need. (Often we are)
  • Statutory and Regulatory authorities are not going to spare us because we are ignorant
  • Employees are not going to consider non-availability just because management is ignorant of what an employee needs
  • Shareholders are not going to be satisfied because we are ignorant about how to provide returns to them

The list can go on.

Do not blame others for your ignorance. Use the Body of Knowledge available to remove the IGNORANCE. This would actually raise each one of us in the real world and success would be at our beck and call. Body of Knowledge exists in various forms and some of them are Library, Books, Internet, and Experienced Individuals etc.

  1. Nurturance by seniors

    Somewhere down the line, we forget how we were taught to speak or for matter of fact anything. The elders in family invested their time with us. They did it with pleasure and the first one to enjoy the success of we writing or speaking was them. Why we cannot behave like those elders in family? Are we not giving the time at the workplace if not more on par with the time with family?

    Nurturing the people in one's team is responsibility of the leader of the team. We need to recollect the earliest and probably even today recognized method of learning as GURUKULAM Method. Here the student learns under the guidance and care of the GURU. For most of us the work place is akin to GURUKULAM and our leaders must behave like a GURU.

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Post Event Photographs

The event was a success that was enjoyed by one and all. Speakers liked it because of attendance and attention by the delegates. Approx 225 delegates participated the conference.

The delegates liked it because of the speakers and the take aways from the speakers.

Look at the pictures of the conference. The entire proceedings would be uploaded shortly. The pictures are available at http://cid-ce7469a16caebf88.skydrive.live.com/browse.aspx/Threads%20of%20Excellence?authkey=WtjBfM0kcM0%24

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

My Views on Culture of Excellence

My views on the Culture of Excellence can be heard at the links given below

  1. Excellence in Downturn

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=OUehH5hwpyI


     

  2. Excellence as a journey

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=WGTBpAugCp8


     

  3. Nationwide Survey on Excellence

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=wCoDAxC32W4


     

  4. Learning Approach

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=IWvZ8uddBF0


     

  5. Boardrooms discussion on Quality

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=2L2jG1QFnH4


     

  6. Approach to Quality certification

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=Bz0WI4oujTk


     

  7. Short Term vs Long Term

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=Gi8sJwyqnGU


     

  8. Going Beyond Checklist Approach

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=cJCpeF-ojDE


     

  9. Inspiration vs Direction

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=QGrBYhn4dvA


     

  10. Metrics of Excellence

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=ffwaNgPQCz8


     

  11. Role Media in Building Culture of Excellence

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=_if0wxv9UP4


     

  12. Role of Acamedia

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=F4gWZKDW014


     

  13. Change to begin at School

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=abzy9q42804


     

  14. Factor to bring in cultural change

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=t-c3F7ukizY


     

  15. Aligning quality with business

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=vKZYG_7vZw0


     

  16. Can ROI stifle Quality

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=aZXv0UOEelg


     

  17. Who can be a change agent

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=F8eZHmDdg_c


     

  18. Threading Individual/ team and Organizational Excellence

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=u1ECNFBZRD8


     

  19. Performance vs excellence

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=8H0trD9iQYo


     

  20. Competency and performance

    http://www.tweetube.com/videos/preview?vid=UeEYqubkFoY

These are interviews as a precursor to the conference on 18th September 2009 at Hotel Accord Metropolitan, Chennai. For details, write to pgs@amc.co.in

Interview on Excellence

My interview on the subject of Culture of Excellence and its link to host of organizational dimension is available at the following:

http://60secondschief.blogspot.com/2009/09/kumar-vembu-founder-ceo-gofrugal.html

http://www.youtube.com/user/pitstop4performers

http://www.experiencefestival.com/forum/vBTube.php?do=user&uname=pitstop4performers

http://www.tweetube.com/search?user=pitstop4performers